Schellhorn is angry that nothing goes on. An interesting supermarket. This could be a lot. But with an argument I believe Schellhorn is wrong. He argues implicitly (at least I've understood) that the strength of the social partner agreed to reform in the government. Because the social partnership blocking any reform.
I just do not think so. I believe that the disorientation and to reform in the grand coalition points to a weakness of the social partnership. The social partnership can no longer against the spin-verdoktorten party grandees enforce or is even gespinnt. The permanent campaign through the media is even worse than to reform in (military service, schools ... you name it). But that's another story ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment